Rating agencies doing the job of bond markets

December 10th, 2009

Share |

Traditionally, the bond market is where governments are kept accountable. In the 1980s, after the inflation nightmare of the 1970s, we have the bond ‘vigilantes’ who watched money supply growth like hawks. Any governments that print money will be punished by the bond vigilantes selling government bonds, thus raising their yields.

Today, the bond vigilantes are neutered. Central banks (obviously we don’t have to name names here) are buying up their governments’ bonds to prop up their prices. This means government bond prices cannot fall. That in turn makes government bonds an attractive destination for those who wants to preserve their capital. The bond vigilantes cannot do their job of punishing irresponsible governments.

Long-term interests was supposed to be determined by the free market via long-term government bond prices. That is supposed to reflect the market’s belief about long-term price inflation rate and the governments’ ability to honour its debts. Today, with governments (via their central banks) sticking their dirty paws on the bond market, bond prices are useless indicators of the credit-worthiness of governments.

Now, we have to rely on credit rating agencies to do that job. This week, the Greek government was infamously downgraded by Fitch. Greek government debt is on par with junk bonds. S&P revised the Spanish government’s credit outlook to negative. Downgrades on bigger fish governments are coming. In fact, Moody is putting the US and UK governments on notice.

Lending at 3.4% for 10 years to the US government is the most mind-boggling stupid investment. Is the market that stupid? Or is it the work of the Federal Reserve?

Tags: , ,

  • Drew Weeks
    Thankyou for that succinct explanation.

    Now I understand it perfectly.
  • Drew Weeks
    So then when the federal reserve buys bonds they do not increase the value of bonds yields? What happens to the bonds the federal reserve purchase then?
  • Drew Weeks
    Contrarian Editor I agree with Pete that you didn't establish why bond vigilantes are neutered.

    If bond vigilantes invest in bonds to keep governments inflation in check and then the federal reserve buys up bonds then the government is still accountable. The money has to be paid to the vigilantes as interest in the bond yield when it matures as well as to the bank. Is this not correct? Shouldn't the monetary hypothetically supply grow if there is demand for it and it becomes part of the system and this money printing then becomes debt to China/private consumers/hedge funds/whoever else invested. I don't see how this neuters the bond vigilantes but I can see how there may be something linked to the federal reserve but you did not explain this is any way.
  • Pete
    Good points.

    Q: Why are the bond vigilantes neutered?

    ...

    Personally I have no trust in the ratings agencies. They were very irresonsible when times seemed good before Oct 2008. Have they somehow decided to be responsible again?

    I think when it comes to the US, the ratings agencies are more likely to be biased towards the US than impartial to it (or even against it).

    In fact it wouldn't surprise me if one rating agency did decide to downgrade the US and then have its reputation attacked - by both the US Government/Fed and the other ratings agencies.
    Eg, he who sticks his neck out might get his head chopped.

    ...

    However...doesn't Europe look interesting at this point? I feel like this is a drumroll before a bigger occassion - European currency crisis.
blog comments powered by Disqus