Permanently low interest rates for Uncle Sam?

November 22nd, 2009

Share |

Imagine you owe a lot of credit card debt. And also imagine you have a prodigal son who blew lots of money away in gambling debts and asked you for a bailout. So, you borrow more from your credit card to help bail out your son. Also, your yearly expenditure is projected to keep on rising.

As you borrow more, more and more of your yearly income is spent on debt repayment. What if, in 5 to 10 years time, half of your annual income has to be set aside for the interest payments alone for your debt? In addition to that, what if you have already made promises to your aged parents that you will be responsible for their aged care expense in that time? Eventually, it will come a time when you have to borrow more and more money to pay the interests on your debt. When that day comes, your debt will explode exponentially.

Well, this is the situation of the United States government. In this story, the prodigal son is Wall Street. The aged parents is the coming unfunded social security and Medicare liability of the US government. As the graph from this news article showed,

Interests on US debt

Interests on US debt

Now, what if you can choose the interest rates of your debt repayment. Obviously, you will select the lowest possible rates in order to reduce your debt burden. This is what the Federal Reserve will have to do. As we quoted Marc Faber in Marc Faber vs Steve Keen in inflation/deflation debate- Part 2: Marc Faber’s view,

By keeping short term rates artificially low and by monetizing the growing fiscal deficits a central bank digs its own grave in terms of its ability to pursue tight monetary policies when such policies become necessary.

The Fed controls the short-term interest rates. It has keep the rates low because by pursuing tight monetary policy now, the short-run cost of servicing the US government’s debt will be significantly increased. As this news article reported,

A Treasury borrowing advisory committee reported in early November that “approximately 40 percent of the debt will need to be refinanced in less than one year.

If the US wants to pursue tight monetary policy soon, it will have to deal with the short-term government. One way to deal with it is to refinance the government debt with more expensive longer-term treasury bonds. But the further the term of the government debt, the less the Fed has control on the interest rates.

What if, the free market insists that the US government pay higher interest rates? In that case, the Fed will have to buy up the government debt (i.e. print money), which artificially pushes up the government bond prices (i.e. push down the yield on the government debt). This is highly price inflationary, which in turn will make the government debt even more undesirable by the free market. That will result in the Fed having to print even more!

Tags: ,

  • David
    Dear CIJ,
    Indeed this is a bad outcome overall, but is it really the outcome the FED will choose? Who does the FED really serve, Wall Street Interests or the Federal Government? I think there is evidence which supports the contention that they are going to serve big banking interests on Wall St, particularly a few chosen Banks that seem to be doing there bidding. So my question is, what are those interests and how will they be served in the current and developing contexts? How will international pressures be developed and be dealt with by the FED (ie can the FED use international pressures on the Administration as cover for what they want to do anyway)? It certainly seems like whatever is left of the responsible world will want to end the new bubbles free dollars will spawn and they will demand tightening. The Chinese certainly don't want their Forex Dollar reserves to dwindle in value as the reckless US loose money policy continues. It is shaping up to be a fight, perhaps the first big one of the new cold war, with the dollar camp fighting a loosing battle against advocates for sound money on the international scene. Of course, like all wars, no one really wins and the US might hold on long enough to really end the system as we have known it. I can't tell if this is already happening now, in a week, or several years. Anyone on the front line have an opinion?
  • Hi David!

    You may to take a read at The Fed Backed Itself into a Corner:

    Over the years, I have warned a seemingly countless number of undergraduates that Fed's hold on monetary independence was tenuous at best. Independence is not guaranteed by the Constitution. Congress made the Fed, and Congress can unmake the Fed. The Fed could only maintain the privilege of independence if policymakers pursued policy paths that fostered maximum, sustainable growth. Deviating from such paths would have consequences.

    The Fed is quickly learning the extent of those consequences, as Congress launches an assault on the Fed's independence.
  • David
    Interesting. It would be nice to see Congress take back some of its power. We'll see how this plays out. Gold hit a new record in Dollar terms this morning over $1165.
  • Pete
    Great article.

    I like your analogy at the start - it's simple but paints the picture well.

    As every day goes by, things get clearer and clearer.

    (and then some other things get even blurrier! ;) ... like global politics and climate change shenannigans)
blog comments powered by Disqus